• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About DCC and the writer
  • Guest Writers
  • Testimonials
  • Archives 2009 – present
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact

Defrosting Cold Cases

Unsolved cases and book reviews

  • Cold Case Database: Index and Summaries
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
  • Two Research Methods
  • How to search for a case
  • Case of the Month
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Forensics / Zeigler, Part IX

Zeigler, Part IX

May 18, 2010 By Alice

Zeigler, Part IX: Let’s talk blood.

Pictured here on the website you see the t-shirt Tommy wore underneath a red dress shirt, the night he was shot and, was supposed to die. On the front of the t-shirt you see a big blood stain underneath the left armpit, right? And on the back of the t-shirt, you see the blood underneath the left arm pit again and on the bottom right, the blood coming from the exit wound where he was shot in the abdomen.

front

Let’s talk about the left arm pit stain. The State’s case against Zeigler was based on the contention that Zeigler killed his father-in-law, Perry Edwards and, therefore, the blood under Zeigler’s left arm (and on the front of Zeigler’s t-shirt) is from the bleeding head of Perry Edwards as Zeigler administered the fatal beating. One of the key pieces of evidence against Tommy was, that the blood stain revealed blood type A. Both his wife Eunice and her father, Perry Edwards had blood type A well as Charlie Mays.

During the original investigation, decisions were made that nowadays would make any cop scream. With multiple victims of whom some were blood related, it would only make sense to not just blood type the evidence but also, to test for DNA. Really, how many people on earth have blood type O positive? One in 3 people, just check the blood book, if you want to know more about that.

Let’s go back to the stains.

The chief contention on which the jury convicted Zeigler was that since Zeigler had his father-in-law’s blood type on his t-shirt underneath the left armpit, it followed that Zeigler had held Perry Edwards in a headlock, beat and later also shot him! And, if he did that to his father-in-law, he certainly was responsible for the shooting deaths of the others. The problem here is of course, that with blood typing, only a part of the story was told. Yes, Tommy had been fighting with someone. Only, that person was Charlie Mays and not his very own father-in-law. But alas, as stated above, both men had blood type A.

Zeigler bloody t-shirt
back

Decades later, Laboratory Corporation of America (LabCorp) in North Carolina performed DNA testing on the t-shirt and other items. Blood Samples of six persons were forwarded to LabCorp: Perry Edwards, Virginia Edwards, Eunice Zeigler, Charlie Mays, Felton Thomas, and Tommy Zeigler.

The key DNA test results were that the tested blood on Zeigler’s t-shirt (under the left arm), on the front pocket of his outer shirt, and on his pants (back, left pocket and left knee) is not the blood of Perry Edwards. It is the blood of Charlie Mays. Zeigler did not have any of Perry Edwards’ blood on him! The other blood on the t-shirt was Zeigler’s own.

Zeigler never denied that he fought with Mays and now we have proof of the battle between these two men. We now have one key piece of evidence that actually exonerates Zeigler. But, this constant connection of the Type A blood of Perry Edwards with the heavy bloodstain under Zeigler’s left arm laid the foundation for Eagan’s closing argument on this point: “You will have the opportunity to examine Mr. Zeigler’s clothing…You will see a soaked area of blood under the left armpit of those shirts. That could have gotten there only by his having someone in his arm who was Type A blood. He didn’t get that crawling around on the floor. Who was bleeding Type A blood!”

It set the stage for Zeigler’s conviction. It took the jury exactly 25 minutes…

To be continued…

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor

Related

Filed Under: Forensics, Zeigler Tagged With: Actual Innocence, Autopsy, Ballistics, Capital Punishment, Crime Labs, DNA, Expert Testimony, Faulty Evidence, Forensics, Miscarriage of Justice, Prosecutorial Misconduct, William Thomas Zeigler, Wrongful Convictions

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Controversial: the Zeigler case - Defrosting Cold Cases says:
    April 1, 2016 at 7:13 am

    […] 2001 already showed how some of the prosecution’s contentions were wrong. You can find that here. Since 2001, technology has advanced further and we now have the possibility to test for touch […]

  2. Good news for William Thomas Zeigler says:
    October 29, 2015 at 9:52 am

    […] The details about the requested DNA were spearheaded by the Kish report. That report including photography is here. Previous DNA testing and results including photography is here. […]

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Top Posts & Pages

  • Sisters in Death by Eli Frankel
  • The cold case of Bernard Oliver (1950 – Jan 1967)
  • Eric Haider Update
  • Evidence in 1970 Crewe murders missing
  • Case of the Month: Teresa Sue Hilt

Categories

  • Book Reviews (186)
  • Case of the Month (130)
  • Cold Case News (229)
  • Forensics (287)
  • Guest Writers (56)
  • Miscarriages of Justice (131)
  • Missing Persons (127)
  • Unidentified (32)
  • Unsolved (522)
  • Zeigler (66)

Author Notes

Since 2009, I write about unsolved cases that need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigations to the authorities.

My posts cover homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to unsolved cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme, tone, and research. It is my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more.

My databases are free to the public. Cases are sorted by the victim’s last name.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the About page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you cannot find the answers there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Copyright © 2025 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress