• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About DCC and the writer
  • Guest Writers
  • Testimonials
  • Archives 2009 – present
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact

Defrosting Cold Cases

Est. 2009

  • Cold Case Database: Index and Summaries
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
  • Two Research Methods
  • How to search for a case
  • Case of the Month (2014 – 2024)
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Zeigler / Zeigler: evil killer or parent-to-be?

Zeigler: evil killer or parent-to-be?

April 25, 2012 By Alice

Zeigler: evil killer or parent-to-be? Something has been bothering me immensely in the Zeigler case. I know, many things bother me in this case! But this is something I have not blogged about before. It is about the life term insurance policies and Zeigler’s bank accounts.

It has been stated over and over again that taking out two life term insurance policies on Eunice were clearly the premeditated actions of a man planning to get rid of his wife and then to collect the dough.

Wrong.

The life term policies were bought because the others in place were insufficient. The new life term insurances were effective Sept 11, 1975 and the other on Oct 7, 1975. I know that this is shortly before the massacre but it also coincided with the Zeiglers’ decision to expand their family by adopting children. A huge fuss was made out of Zeigler buying a bigger car and a pool to be installed at the house. Was Zeigler anticipating “the big life” after he’d be conveniently widowed or, was he just planning to accommodate his newly enlarged family?

According to the court records his cash flow was pretty low. His checking account around December 22, 1975 was just $480 dollars. That is not a lot of money for a millionaire, right? Here you can see that despite being a successfull business man Zeigler had not thought through all his finances and what he might need. All his assets were investments (furniture store, stock and apartment buildings) and from the bank accounts it appears that there were no additional saving accounts (aside from the checking account) to use as “ready cash flow” in cases of emergency.

Eunice had stopped teaching. She took care of her father, her father-in-law, and the household. As a mother-to-be, she would be around the kids all day. If anything happened to her Tommy would need help. If Eunice would become ill for a prolonged period of time, Tommy would need to hire help for the household and possibly a nanny. Since there was no ready cash flow, he was probably advised to make sure something was at hand hence the life term insurance policies.

I often wonder how this man keeps his sanity after he lost so much. His parents passed away, his parents-in-law slain, his wealth and freedom gone but most importantly, his beloved wife … gone. Sue Carney wrote an excellent post about this.

Nobody has been digging into Florida adoption rules for 1975. Were there any rules that dictated that a couple needed to be financially insured in a specific manner before they’d be eligible to adopt? I’d like to know.

You see, if you start from the premise that Zeigler was an evil killer all his actions can be seen as a man preparing for life after he got rid of his wife. This is what the state likes you to believe.

However, if you listen to Zeigler and heard what he said about not having been able to have children and their decision to adopt, his actions make sense.

He was acting like a father-to-be.

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for sharing!

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor

Related

Filed Under: Zeigler Tagged With: Capital Punishment, Faulty Evidence, Florida, Prosecutorial Misconduct, William Thomas Zeigler, Wrongful Convictions

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

Since 2009, I write about unsolved cases that need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigations to the authorities.

My posts cover homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to unsolved cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme, tone, and research. It is my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more.

My databases are free to the public. Cases are sorted by the victim’s last name.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the About page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you cannot find the answers there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Top Posts & Pages

  • Gregory McRoberts: hit-and-run victim
  • Eric Haider Update
  • Gone for 50 years: the Beaumont Children
  • John David Watson Jr (1959 - 1974)
  • Gregory McRoberts DNA Update

Categories

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Protected by Copyscape

Copyright © 2026 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress