• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About the author and her website
  • References
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Research website by Alice de Sturler

  • My Research Method
  • How to search for cases
  • Cold Case Database
  • Case of the Month: What we lost
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Sum it up! / Sum it up! #3

Sum it up! #3

January 22, 2011 By Alice

sum it up #cclivechatWeek 3: Sum it up! We saw a mixed bag of information this week about cold cases, DNA, forensic labs, testing and of course, funding.

DNA was instrumental in cracking the 1994 throat slashing murder of Theresa Whetstone (Buffalo, NY) and the 1985 murder of Candace Derksen (Elmwood, Canada). At the same time, we see DNA backlogs in New Orleans affecting rape cases. We are roughly looking at 1100 untested rape kits. “Many of the untested rape kits were in the basement of Police Headquarters at the time of Hurricane Katrina, which means, many of those rape kits will be unusable.”

While New Orleans and other cities try and fight their backlogs, UK MPs consider closing the UK government-owned Forensic Science Service (FSS). Last December, the government announced that it would drop that service. FSS analyses evidence from crime scenes in England and Wales but is losing about £2m per month. “The service is regarded as a world-class organisation that has been at the forefront of innovation in forensics.” The government wants private enterprise, which makes up 40% of the market, to fill the gap left by the FSS.

Funding is also crucial to finally get answers in the case of the Waldo rapist. Police in Kansas City (Ohio) have a man in custody who is charged with four rapes that were more than two decades old. But nobody has officially labeled him the Waldo rapist. “The KCPD has a cold-case squad specifically dedicated to sex crimes. Except now, it looks like that squad is about to be the victim of a tight budget.” The department failed to win a $500,000 grant renewal to keep the squad together and active. All the cases will now be redistributed back to the officers who were in charge of the cases before the squad took over.

Paul Kennedy describes in his post “Court deems lab reports inadmissible” how lab reports are testimonial in nature meaning that the lab technician who wrote that report must appear on the stand to face the accused.

They faced accusations of the worst kind. They supposedly sexually assaulted their own daughters. Cleared by DNA these fathers, Kevin Fox and Jerry Hobbs, now fight for mandatory DNA testing and for the abolition of the death penalty in Illinois. The Illinois House’s legislature to abolish the death penalty is on Governor Quinn’s desk. No word as of yet whether the Governor will sign it.

False accusations in the Willingham case will not be retracted yet. “The Texas Forensic Science Commission  last Friday again delayed its last opinion on the merits of an arson investigation that sent Willingham to the death chamber seven years ago. At the meeting, the commissioners also decided to move forward with a draft report, but it will not touch on the questions referred to the attorney general. The next meet is on April 15.” You can watch the January 7th 2011 hearing onYouTube. Look in the right margin because there are five parts.

The Guardian’s article “The stain of complicity in torture” is chilling to the bone. “Despite the coalition agreement stating unequivocally: “We will never condone torture”, legal proceedings currently under way suggest British agents could still be guilty of complicity. The allegation is that British agents, in a more subtle crime than the actual torture conducted by American officials, benefited from the blatant violations of other states. Intelligence officials gleaned information from detainees being questioned by overseas regimes whose mistreatment and torture has been well documented.” The article has links to earlier articles on the subject.

On a lighter note, there has been turmoil in the blogosphere about labels. Those who blog about everything non-law related usually call their website a blog. Those who blog about law related issues and especially those who are lawyers by profession call their website a blawg. Get it? Law and blog = blawg. But, as Antonin Pribetic’s post indicates, there is more! In his post “My gift to the Social Media Law Marketers: The Flawg” he describes in detail the effects of social media law marketers. If you have been active on Twitter, than you know the many discussions that flow around there about the use and abuse of social media law marketers. I draw your attention to the ending of the article where flawg, flawgers and flawgosphere are defined!

There was also the question of why people blog and then give up. Is it a too demanding task? Do they expect a loyal following overnight? Are their expectations founded in reality or in dreams? The article shows you how some people started blogging and then gave up. So, now I’d like to know from my readers: if you had a blog and gave up: after what time did you gave up and why? Did statistics play a role e.g. not enough readers/views? What did you define as not enough readers? Was one hundred views per day low, acceptable or high? Did you start blogging with the expectation to get more out of it e.g. a book contract or a more prominent presence in a particular industry? If you stopped blogging, did you switch over to another medium? Just curious!

Have you heard of “Three Geeks and a Law Blog?” They describe an interesting combination of Google maps with a history pin. You check out a map and while your mouse rolls over the map, interesting law related details appear that are connected to that building or street or area. Read it, I thought it was a great idea!

New maps are also being used by the Knox County Sheriff’s Office. They bring you a real time crime map on their website to arm citizens and cops with as much information. It is almost like walking a beat with a cop and seeing what goes on in your area. Check it out!

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Sum it up! Tagged With: Cameron Todd Willingham, Candace Derksen, Forensic arson detection, Jerry Hobbs, Kevin Fox, Laura Henderson-Ibach, Paul Kennedy, Sharron Prior, Sum it Up!, Texas Forensic Science Commission, Theresa Whetstone, Waldo Rapist

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Blawg Review #295 | National Cyber Security says:
    July 16, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    […] I liked the Vidster’s summary of happenings with DNA, cold cases, and funding for forensics at the Defrosting Cold Cases […]

  2. Blawg Review #295 | Cyberlaw Central says:
    January 24, 2011 at 12:57 am

    […] I liked the Vidster’s summary of happenings with DNA, cold cases, and funding for forensics at the Defrosting Cold Cases […]

  3. Defrosting Cold Cases » Blog Archive » Week 3: Sum it up! | Human Identification Daily says:
    January 24, 2011 at 12:31 am

    […] Defrosting Cold Cases » Blog Archive » Week 3: Sum it up! […]

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

On this website, I write about old, unsolved cases. Most are from the pre-DNA era and are in need of renewed media attention. I only do research and leave the active investigation of these cases to the professionals.

My posts are about homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to these cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme and research. It remains my prerogative to not review a book.

My database has over 300 cases listed by the victim’s last name. You will find a brief description there as well. The database will always be free to the public to use. You cannot buy ad space on my website, ever.

All writing suggestions that come in by email are added to my to-do list in the order in which they were received. Please be patient. My to-do list is very long but no case gets dropped and I will get back in touch.

Defrosting Cold Cases is NOT an organization. It is my brainchild.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the about page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you still cannot find the answer there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Categories

Top Posts & Pages

  • Cold Case Database
  • How to search for cases
  • Gina Renee Hall partial remains found
  • Eric Haider Update
  • Arrest in 1993 Kimberly Dunkin Case

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

RSS Defrosting Cold Cases

  • What we lost
  • The Ethics of Forensic Genealogy part 2
  • Once Two Sister by Sarah Warburton
  • Toronto John Doe 1989
  • Paul Bernard Quinters (1967 – 1993)

William Thomas Zeigler

Category: ALL POSTS

On March 31, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was held to request touch DNA testing. On July 18, 2016, Judge Whitehead denied that request.

On November 23, 2016, an appeal was filed with the Florida Supreme Court. On April 21, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the request for touch DNA analysis.

On May 8, 2017 a motion for a rehearing with the US Supreme Court was filed. It was denied November 13, 2017.

In the summer of 2019, the appeal for DNA testing to the Florida Conviction Integrity Unit was denied.

Richard Lapointe

Category: ALL POSTS

In March 2015, the Connecticut State Supreme Court ordered a new trial for Richard lapointe. On Oct 2, 2015, International Wrongful Conviction Day, Richard was set free. The judge ruled that he cannot be retried for the 1987 rape-murder of Mrs. Bernice Martin. Richard Lapointe died on Aug 4, 2020 of Covid19 complications.

In 1987, someone killed Bernice Martin. I hope that she will not become a forgotten file.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright: Please add a link back if you use my work. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. If you need help with this, just contact me. Thank you, Alice de Sturler

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2009–2021 - Defrosting Cold Cases - All rights reserved · Hosting & WordPress: 3J WordPress Write Data

wordpress counter

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.