• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home Page
  • About this website and the writer
  • Testimonials
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Unsolved cases that need your attention

  • Cold Case Database
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
  • Two Research Methods
  • Search Tips
  • Case of the Month
  • Guest Writers
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Cold Case News / Update McLeod in 1989 arson case

Update McLeod in 1989 arson case

July 3, 2012 By Alice

Prosecutors have recently filed a brief with the New Hampshire Supreme Court arguing for the admission of evidence they deem critical to their 1989 arson case against David McLeod that killed the Hina Family.

“Earlier this year, the high court accepted a pretrial appeal from the N.H. Attorney General’s Office, which is asking it to overturn an order by Superior Court Judge Marguerite L. Wageling that prosecutors say would “seriously compromise” their ability to prove McLeod set the blaze.

Wageling ruled in September that the state’s three fire science experts cannot testify at trial that they believe fire was arson, because their findings included consideration of statements from a witness who died in 2005. That witness — Sandra Walker — lived in the second-floor apartment where officials said the Jan. 14, 1989, fire started. She described in interviews with police how she woke up to flames engulfing her small room and said at first she believed she may have fallen asleep with a lit cigarette, which she later recanted.”

In Wageling’s ruling on the motion, she wrote that because the experts’ opinions were not independent of Walker’s statements, they would not be allowed to testify. Federal fire investigators who analyzed photos of the fire concluded that char patterns in Walker’s apartment cannot be relied on because the apartment combusted in a “flashover” fire of intense heat.

Flashover has featured here on DCC before in the cases of Willingham, Richey, Dougherty, Gavitt, Han Tak Lee and others.

In short, what we thought we knew about fire was wrong. We used to think that fire always went up and never down and that fire fueled by accelerants burned faster and hotter than other fires. We also always thought that crazed glass, V-patterns and certain black markings were evidence of pour patterns of accelerants hence arson. We were wrong. Now we know we are dealing with flashover.

Gavitt’s situation is similar to Willingham’s. Both opened a door and a surge of oxygen reached the fire in the house. It turned into a house on fire.

Richey’s case is similar to McLeod’s. In both, a burning or smouldering cigarette might have set on fire an ordinary household pieces that naturally contained combustible materials. In both cases the question is whether Richey or McLeod added any accelerants. In the case of Richey, the use of an accelerant was alleged but never proven.

The McLeod case bears watching as we have many more cases that should be checked for faulty arson detection.

To be continued!

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor

Related

Filed Under: Cold Case News, Forensics, Unsolved Tagged With: Autopsy, David McLeod, flashover, Forensic arson detection, Hina Family, Identification, New Hampshire

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Top Posts & Pages

  • Cold Case Database
  • Remembering Ronnie and Connie Collins
  • Who killed Alexander Harris?
  • In memory: Azaria Chantel Loren Chamberlain
  • Case of the Month: Teresa Sue Hilt

Categories

  • Book Reviews (182)
  • Case of the Month (130)
  • Cold Case News (226)
  • Forensics (287)
  • Guest Bloggers (57)
  • Miscarriages of Justice (131)
  • Missing Persons (127)
  • Unidentified (32)
  • Unsolved (524)
  • Zeigler (65)

Author Notes

Since 2009, I write about unsolved cases that need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigations to the authorities.

My posts cover homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to unsolved cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme, tone, and research. It is my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more.

My databases are free to the public. Cases are sorted by the victim’s last name.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the About page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you cannot find the answers there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Copyright © 2025 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress