• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About DCC and the writer
  • Guest Writers
  • Testimonials
  • Archives 2009 – present
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact

Defrosting Cold Cases

Unsolved cases and book reviews

  • Cold Case Database: Index and Summaries
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
  • Two Research Methods
  • How to search for a case
  • Case of the Month
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Miscarriages of Justice / New trial in Central City Massacre

New trial in Central City Massacre

March 9, 2010 By Alice

Michael Anderson

An Orleans Parish Criminal District Court judge today granted a new trial for Michael Anderson in the 2006 Central City massacre that left five teenagers dead, agreeing with the defense team that prosecutors violated the rules at his August trial that ended with a jury condemning Anderson to death row.

“The ends of justice require that Michael Anderson receive a new trial,” Judge Lynda Van Davis wrote, in a seven-page ruling that found prosecutors’ withholding of a videotaped interview with the sole eyewitness, and a jailhouse informant’s plea deal, could have blindsided his defense attorneys.

Prosecutors said they will appeal. Orleans Parish District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro will hold a news conference Monday afternoon at 2:30 p.m. outside his headquarters at 619 S. White St.

It’s the first time in recent state history that a trial judge has granted a new trial in a capital murder case, said defense attorney Richard Bourke, who represents Anderson post-conviction in the Central City massacre.

Davis heard two days of testimony last week as Anderson’s post-conviction defense team presented 18 grounds in an argument that included the bombshell that prosecutors had a two-hour videotaped interview with their sole eyewitness to the Central City massacre that they didn’t turn over to the defense until Jan. 5. Also at issue in Anderson’s demand for a new trial is the fact that a jailhouse informant, Ronnie Morgan, who testified that Anderson bragged to him about the shootings failed to tell the jury that he had a longstanding plea deal with prosecutors that required his cooperation in the case.

Anderson hasn’t yet been formally sentenced to Louisiana’s death row at the state prison in Angola, and remains at Orleans Parish Prison. Read the entire article here.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor

Related

Filed Under: Miscarriages of Justice Tagged With: Capital Punishment, Evidence, Jailhouse Informants, Louisiana, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Video Tapped Testimony

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Top Posts & Pages

  • Lisa Thomas: 50 years unsolved
  • Cold Case Database
  • Missing: Joanna Lopez
  • The cold case of Bernard Oliver (1950 – Jan 1967)
  • Case of the Month: Keith Blakelock

Categories

  • Book Reviews (186)
  • Case of the Month (130)
  • Cold Case News (229)
  • Forensics (287)
  • Guest Writers (56)
  • Miscarriages of Justice (131)
  • Missing Persons (127)
  • Unidentified (32)
  • Unsolved (522)
  • Zeigler (66)

Author Notes

Since 2009, I write about unsolved cases that need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigations to the authorities.

My posts cover homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to unsolved cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme, tone, and research. It is my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more.

My databases are free to the public. Cases are sorted by the victim’s last name.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the About page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you cannot find the answers there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Copyright © 2025 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress