• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About the author and her website
  • References
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Research website by Alice de Sturler

  • My Research Method
  • How to search for cases
  • Cold Case Database
  • Case of the Month: The Unclaimed
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Miscarriages of Justice / Zeigler, Part XXI: Legal Consequences

Zeigler, Part XXI: Legal Consequences

April 13, 2012 By Alice

Zeigler, Part XXI: Legal Consequences of the false arrest report and the lies told by Detective Frye under oath? We have to go back to the initial trial when Mr. Zeigler was defended by Mr. Ralph V. Hadley, III.

Mr. Hadley started the Zeigler trial from the assumption that the documents he had received were correct. His private investigator, Gene Anan, who checked the facts in the case could not find a Robert Foster. Detective Frye continuously told the defense that he did not know a Robert Foster. He even stated so on the stand and that there had just been a typographical error in the arrest report. Therefore, Hadley and the rest of the Zeigler defense team relied on the state’s assertions that: Robert Foster did not exist, that Frye had not spoken to a man named Robert Foster and, that therefore there was no involvement of a man named Robert Foster in the Zeigler case. Frye signed a new arrest report dated March 26, 1976 leaving out any information about a man called Robert Foster.

If Hadley had evidence that Robert Foster did exist, he would have undermined the credibility of one of the state’s own witnesses. The state has an obligation under Brady v. Maryland to disclose any favourable evidence even if that meant it could impeach their own witnesses.

If the truth had come out at trial that Robert Foster did exist it would have impeached the testimony of Detective Frye. He was untruthful during his investigation in which he intentionally held back information that placed another man at the scene of the crime. Also, if Robert Foster was really supposedly Felton Thomas, the latter’s testimony would have been impeached as well for he never mentioned on the stand that indeed, he was the man meant by Det. Frye.

But it gets worse.

Robert Foster was not a bystander. In the article by Jean Gonzalez, you can read that Foster “has a criminal history in North Carolina that includes several different traffic misdemeanors, but also two charges of assault against women, felony larceny, escape from prison, breaking and entering, and armed robbery. In Florida, he spent two years in prison for aggravated battery and in 2007 began a three-year sentence for possession of cocaine.” Moreover, Foster is believed to be “the man who tried to rob the Gulf station was Foster, and that it is too coincidental that the robbery would occur so soon before the events at the furniture store across the street, and, even more coincidental, the officer who went to the Gulf station was Thompson and he never made a police report of the incident.” Chief Thompson’s full report has been posted on DCC.

What does this mean?

It means that a man with a known criminal past was near the scene of the crime. Add to that the concealment by both Det. Frye and Chief Thompson and the defense could easily have established that the investigation was incomplete and that leads where not properly investigated. It also would have supported Mr. Zeigler when he stated that he felt his family store was being robbed by several armed robbers during the night of December 24th, 1975, and that he and his family interrupted them.

All the above (including the information in my two previous posts) would have created reasonable doubt.

To summarize:

the crimes happened on December 24, 1975

the first arrest report mentioning Robert Foster is dated December 29, 1975

the second arrest report without any mention of Robert Foster is dated March 26, 1976

the deposition of Det. Frye in which he claims a typographical error is dated April 23, 1976.

The motion has been filed. Now we wait, again.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Miscarriages of Justice, Zeigler Tagged With: Capital Punishment, Death Row, Florida, Miscarriage of Justice, Prosecutorial Misconduct

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Petition for Cert filed for Zeigler says:
    April 4, 2014 at 3:35 pm

    […] I explained in the post “Legal Consequences” the original trial lawyer Terry Hadley started the Zeigler defense from the assumption that […]

  2. Zeigler: Appeal Denied says:
    November 15, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    […] evidence hinged on the false arrest report by Det. Frye. It is discussed here. What are the consequences of the false arrest report and the lies told by Detective Frye under oath? We have to go back to […]

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

On this website, I write about old, unsolved cases. Most are from the pre-DNA era and are in need of renewed media attention. I only do research and leave the active investigation of these cases to the professionals.

My posts are about homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to these cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme and research. It remains my prerogative to not review a book.

My database has over 325 cases listed by the victim’s last name. You will find a brief description there as well. The database will always be free to the public to use. You cannot buy ad space on my website, ever.

All writing suggestions that come in by email are added to my to-do list in the order in which they were received. Please be patient. My to-do list is very long but no case gets dropped and I will get back in touch.

Defrosting Cold Cases is NOT an organization. It is my brainchild.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the about page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you still cannot find the answer there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Categories

Top Posts & Pages

  • Cold Case Database
  • How to search for cases
  • Gina Renee Hall partial remains found
  • Missing: Norvel Robert Nelson III
  • Archive

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

RSS Defrosting Cold Cases

  • Missing: Norvel Robert Nelson III
  • Gun Violence
  • Emily Johanne Carmela Starkloff
  • Donald Ray Watson (1953 – 1978)
  • DeAngelo moves to Corcoran State Prison

William Thomas Zeigler

Category: ALL POSTS

On March 31, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was held to request touch DNA testing. On July 18, 2016, Judge Whitehead denied that request.

On November 23, 2016, an appeal was filed with the Florida Supreme Court. On April 21, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the request for touch DNA analysis.

On May 8, 2017 a motion for a rehearing with the US Supreme Court was filed. It was denied November 13, 2017.

In the summer of 2019, the appeal for DNA testing to the Florida Conviction Integrity Unit was denied.

Richard Lapointe

Category: ALL POSTS

In March 2015, the Connecticut State Supreme Court ordered a new trial for Richard lapointe. On Oct 2, 2015, International Wrongful Conviction Day, Richard was set free. The judge ruled that he cannot be retried for the 1987 rape-murder of Mrs. Bernice Martin. Richard Lapointe died on Aug 4, 2020 of Covid19 complications.

In 1987, someone killed Bernice Martin. I hope that she will not become a forgotten file.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright: Please add a link back if you use my work. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. If you need help with this, just contact me. Thank you, Alice de Sturler

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2009–2021 - Defrosting Cold Cases - All rights reserved · Hosting & WordPress: 3J WordPress Write Data

wordpress counter

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.