• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About DCC and the writer
  • Guest Writers
  • Testimonials
  • Archives 2009 – present
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact

Defrosting Cold Cases

Est. 2009

  • Cold Case Database: Index and Summaries
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
  • Two Research Methods
  • How to search for a case
  • Case of the Month (2014 – 2024)
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Miscarriages of Justice / Lapointe hearings resume Aug 2010

Lapointe hearings resume Aug 2010

July 19, 2010 By Alice

Lapointe with family

Questions about how long a fire burned at Mrs. Martin’s apartment and possibly tainted DNA evidence on a pair of gloves found at the crime scene were brought up last Thursday during a hearing for Richard Lapointe. Mrs. Bernice Martin was raped, stabbed and strangled in her apartment in Manchester on March 8, 1987.

Lapointe was convicted in 1992 and is now in Superior Court in Rockville, Bethlehem, PA, seeking a new trial. The hearing is scheduled to resume in August.

Robert Corry, a fire expert hired by state prosecutors, testified last Thursday that a fire set on Martin’s couch didn’t spread very far because poor ventilation in the apartment and some materials left on a seat cushion prevented it from doing so. Instead, the fire smoldered, possibly for well over an hour before it was discovered, Corry said. His testimony contradicts that of a fire expert put on the stand by Lapointe’s attorneys in May, who said the fire couldn’t have burned more than 60 minutes.

Mrs. Bernice Martin

The fire’s burn time has been a key issue because it could support Lapointe’s alibi. Lapointe, who was married to Martin’s granddaughter, reported the fire at 8:27 p.m. A shorter burn time could place him at home with his family at the time Martin was killed.

Lapointe’s attorney, Paul Casteleiro, suggested during cross examination that Corry’s description of the fire changed after he heard the defense’s fire expert, John D. DeHaan, testify. Corry disagreed. Casteleiro pointed to a report, written before DeHaan’s testimony, where Corry summarized his findings about the fire and described the flames as moderately heavy. On Thursday, Corry said the flames were “restrained.”

Casteleiro suggested Corry’s testimony differed from parts of his report because he wanted to support the state’s theory about the fire. Casteleiro also asked why there was no evidence of the materials that Corry said had been left on the seat cushion.

Testimony was also heard last Thursday about a pair of gloves found at the crime scene. Jody Hynds, a forensic scientist from California hired by Lapointe’s team, previously testified that DNA taken from the gloves was not a match for either Lapointe or Martin.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor

Related

Filed Under: Miscarriages of Justice Tagged With: Actual Innocence, DNA, Miscarriage of Justice, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Richard A. Lapointe

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

Since 2009, I write about unsolved cases that need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigations to the authorities.

My posts cover homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to unsolved cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme, tone, and research. It is my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more.

My databases are free to the public. Cases are sorted by the victim’s last name.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the About page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you cannot find the answers there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Top Posts & Pages

  • Gregory McRoberts: hit-and-run victim
  • Gregory McRoberts DNA Update
  • Gone for 50 years: the Beaumont Children
  • Remembering Dana Bailey
  • Frog Boys: finally an update

Categories

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Protected by Copyscape

Copyright © 2026 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress