• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home Page
  • About this website and the writer
  • Testimonials
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Unsolved cases that need your attention

  • Cold Case Database
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
  • Two Research Methods
  • Search Tips
  • Case of the Month
  • Guest Writers
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Miscarriages of Justice / Lapointe hearing July 7-8-9, 2010

Lapointe hearing July 7-8-9, 2010

July 10, 2010 By Alice

Christopher Cosgrove, Lapointe’s public defender during the criminal trial, and Henry Theodore Vogt, who sought a new trial for Lapointe in the late 1990s, testified during the latest hearing seeking a new trial for Lapointe.

Paul Casteleiro, Lapointe’s current lawyer, focused on what Cosgrove and Vogt didn’t do when they handled the Lapointe case in court.

The time that the fire was ignited and how long it burned weren’t addressed during the trial, Cosgrove testified. Timing would have been addressed if notes from a detective — estimating that the fire burned for 30 to 40 minutes before Lapointe called police — had been made available to the defense, he said. But the detective’s note didn’t surface until after the trial.

Casteleiro argues that the burn time could help Lapointe prove he was with his family at their Manchester condo when the fire at Martin’s apartment started.

When he sought a new trial, Vogt alleged that Lapointe’s public defenders were ineffective.

On Wednesday, Casteleiro asked Vogt why he didn’t question the public defenders about key evidence that Vogt claimed they should have used during the trial.

In several instances Wednesday, Vogt said he did not recall what he asked or did not ask the attorneys during the hearing in the late 1990s. But he did agree that he relied on testimony from a legal expert to prove that Lapointe had had ineffective representation.

Casteleiro rested after Vogt’s testimony and state prosecutor Michael O’Hare called a fire expert to the witness stand to refute previous testimony of John D. DeHaan, an expert called by the defense.

Mrs. Bernice Martin

Robert Corry, a self-employed fire investigator, said the fire set on Bernice Martin’s couch was a low-energy fire that mostly smoldered.

Unlike DeHaan, a criminalist and fire investigator from California, who had testified that the fire on the couch burned for about 10 minutes, Corry said determining the longevity of the fire is difficult. He said it could have smoldered for some time.

Corry estimated that the fire was set between 5:45 p.m. when Martin was seen throwing out garbage and about 7 p.m., when her daughter couldn’t reach her on the telephone.

He also contradicted DeHaan’s testimony that the temperature inside the home was 400 degrees when firefighters arrived. Corry said the firefighters would have been burned if the temperature was that high, but they were not injured.

Perhaps searching for a technicality to use to justify a new trial, Judge Nazzaro has been especially interested in the Manchester police department’s decision to secretly tape an interview with Karen Lapointe, Richard Lapointe’s ex-wife. Curiously, police said they saw no reason to tape Lapionte’s crucial confession on the same day – even though he recanted twice before and his words became the foundation for the state’s case.

Nazzaro, of course, could also rule on what motivates Lapointe’s hardy supporters, who have filled benches in the courtroom throughout this trial: that the small, uncoordinated man with the malformed brain was not capable of the vicious murder of 160-pound Bernice Martin, who was tied up, tortured, tossed about, raped and left to die in a burning apartment. To be continued.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor

Related

Filed Under: Miscarriages of Justice Tagged With: Actual Innocence, Arson Detection, Autopsy, DNA, Forensics, Miscarriage of Justice, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Rape kits, Richard A. Lapointe

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Top Posts & Pages

  • Cold Case Database
  • Who killed Alexander Harris?
  • The 1975 murder of Sharron Prior
  • Anita Mae Carter Lukander (Oct 21, 1965 - March 18, 1988)
  • Missing: Wendy Eaton 

Categories

  • Book Reviews (182)
  • Case of the Month (130)
  • Cold Case News (226)
  • Forensics (287)
  • Guest Bloggers (57)
  • Miscarriages of Justice (131)
  • Missing Persons (127)
  • Unidentified (32)
  • Unsolved (524)
  • Zeigler (65)

Author Notes

Since 2009, I write about unsolved cases that need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigations to the authorities.

My posts cover homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to unsolved cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme, tone, and research. It is my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more.

My databases are free to the public. Cases are sorted by the victim’s last name.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the About page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you cannot find the answers there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Copyright © 2025 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress