• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About DCC and the writer
  • Guest Writers
  • Testimonials
  • Archives 2009 – present
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact

Defrosting Cold Cases

Est. 2009

  • Cold Case Database: Index and Summaries
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
  • Two Research Methods
  • How to search for a case
  • Case of the Month (2014 – 2024)
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Book Reviews / Damn his blood by Peter Moore

Damn his blood by Peter Moore

August 22, 2015 By Alice

Damn his blood - Peter Moore
Damn his blood – Peter Moore

Damn his blood by Peter Moore tells us the story about the 1806 murder of Reverend George Parker that happened in Oddingley, UK. I happened upon this book while on vacation in London. We were in Waterstones, Islington, when I saw this book on the £0.99 cart. The woodcut and the different fonts on the cover caught my eye.

Peter Moore describes the murder in such detail that you can see the story and all underlying plots unfold. Plots, as there’s more than one murder described in the book.

Moore starts with Parker’s last day on earth. It begins peacefully. We learn that Parker has a wife and a young daughter. But two pages later you read that Parker was “a man in a state of burning, both his clothes and his flesh.” Two butchers, Thomas Giles and John Lench, who followed the cries of others about a gunshot, saw a man fleeing. Giles set in the pursuit and comes close but when threatened, gives up.

The book is enriched with woodcuts, maps, and photography. It explains the setting in the UK, the landscape, the relationship between the farmers, and the economy in the 1800s. Early on in the story it is clear that Parker was an ambitious man. The reason is not clear to me. Was it pure self-improvement, financial gain, social standing or, a combination? Moore raises the issue of vanity and pretentiousness and rightfully so. Whatever Parker’s reasons were, he had the tact of a bull inside a fine china store and would soon suffer the consequences.

Key players are Captain Evans who plotted with his occasional employee Richard Hemming, a carpenter, against Parker. Joseph Taylor, a specialist horseman, and farmers John Barnett and Thomas Clewes, each had grievances against Parker. However, Evans had more. With his background he understood the changing economical and political landscape because of the war against Bonaparte and the industrial revolution. Rural life would change fundamentally.

Oddingley, as other surrounding areas, was plagued by inflation. During the time of the murder, it was not just the poor who suffered. The middle class felt the financial pinch as well. The costs of living went through the roof. Parker made the brilliant deduction that his financial situation could be changed by simply raising taxes. As a Reverend, he showed callous disregard for those around him. According to his logic, he had added expenses now that he had a wife and daughter. So he decided to make some changes to the tithe that the rent-paying village farmers owed him.

Before he arrived in Oddingley, the parish had a compound tithe meaning

  • one fixed price of £135
  • paid annually
  • in one single payment
  • on March 25

Tithe law is complex as there are many subcategories so any simplification is welcome. And it worked well until Parker decided during a period of inflation and dispute, to start collecting the tithe in kind. In other words, he would travel from farmer to farmer, assess their crops, claim his share, and immediately transport that back to his property for storage. This didn’t sit well with the farmers.

Nothing unites people more than to have a common enemy to hate, bash, gossip about, and then to rally around to raise morale. That’s what the farmers did in the pub. United by their belief that Parker was greedy, they felt very close to each other. And when closeness and alcohol come together confessing true feelings are just another pitcher away. It led to the dangerous “I wish someone would…” phase. And of course, someone did.

In 1806, the UK didn’t have a professional police system as we know it now. Theories for crime prevention and investigations were not applied by teams of detectives who would secure the scene and start canvassing the area. But the people did have a great system in place to try to apprehend suspects or at least, to warn their fellow neighbours. This is the famous hue and cry system e.g. screaming “stop that thief!” If that didn’t bring results, the reward system often did. Parker’s killer escaped nonetheless.

After Giles and Lench found Parker, the outrage about the Reverend’s murder was mild. Reverend Reginald Pyndar, one of King George’s justices of the peace, who lived in a neighbouring parish, took control of the investigation. After an examination, the coroner found that Parker had trauma to the right side of his head and back as a result of the shotgun. In addition, Parker had a fractured skull with bone beaten into his brain. Either major wound group would separately have resulted in Parker bleeding to death. The second attack just ensured that Parker died silently.

Many details did not surface during the investigation such as the growing animosity against Parker in the village and the secret pub confessions. Of course, there were rumours but the villagers also knew that some would act on them. But they remained silent. The man Giles followed was Hemming and the jury accepted him to be Parker’s killer. But he had escaped.

Hemmings’ wife, Elizabeth Burton, took care of her husband’s business accounts and kept a close eye on the family’s income. Her notes in his ledger would later become evidence against Evans. How Hemming was found, you need to read for yourself. You will not be disappointed.

The story is so rich in description that you almost wished the author left some out to allow your own imagination to fill in the blanks. I also believe that the book would have benefitted from a timeline, enumerations by bullet points, footnotes especially where another criminal cases is mentioned, and from a list of the most important characters in this case.

Highly recommended reading!

Thank you for sharing!

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor

Related

Filed Under: Book Reviews Tagged With: Book Reviews, George Parker, Oddingley, Peter Moore, Richard Hemming

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Sum it Up #53 says:
    December 6, 2016 at 3:36 pm

    […] swamped with book reviews but I cannot complain because I love reading. I just posted the one from Peter Moore and I am now reading a book with ties to the area where I live. This may not be a good move but I […]

  2. It was the right decision! | Boomerang Zone says:
    August 24, 2015 at 9:14 am

    […] finished a book review that was lingering. It was such a detailed book that it needed a detailed review why l liked […]

  3. It was the right decision | boomerang zone says:
    August 24, 2015 at 5:42 am

    […] finished a book review that was lingering. It was such a detailed book that it needed a detailed review why l liked […]

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

Since 2009, I write about unsolved cases that need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigations to the authorities.

My posts cover homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to unsolved cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme, tone, and research. It is my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more.

My databases are free to the public. Cases are sorted by the victim’s last name.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the About page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you cannot find the answers there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Top Posts & Pages

  • Gregory McRoberts: hit-and-run victim
  • Gregory McRoberts DNA Update
  • Deborah Ann Danhaus (Oct 4, 1952 – Aug 1971)  
  • Gone for 50 years: the Beaumont Children
  • Remembering Dana Bailey

Categories

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Protected by Copyscape

Copyright © 2026 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress