• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About the writer and her website
  • References
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Research website by Alice de Sturler

  • Cold Case Research Methods
  • How to search for cases
  • Summer Spotlight: Teresa “Tess” Sue Hilt
  • Book Reviews
  • Cold Case Database
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
You are here: Home / Cold Case News / Zeigler’s DNA hearing ends without a decision

Zeigler’s DNA hearing ends without a decision

December 1, 2011 By Alice

Zeigler’s DNA hearing ends without a decision. Today Mr. Zeigler‘s DNA hearing took place in Orange County, Florida, before Judge R. Whitehead. Mr. Zeigler himself was not present. However, he was available by phone if he was needed by the State, otherwise, his presence was waived in person and by phone.

Passionate opening statements were made by defense attorney John Houston Pope. Mr. Pope, on the case since 1991, impressed on the court the importance of testing Mr. Zeigler’s clothes. Mistakes had been made before, see my post “Let’s talk blood” and the 2002 DNA report.

The testing in this case is crucial for the simple fact that from the four dead people three were blood related with the same blood type A. Moreover, the non-related fourth dead person also had blood type A!

Mr. Pope called Senior Ass. State Attorney General Nunnelly’s opening “procedural gobligook.” Basically, the state repeated the “they had their chance” to ask for this before and that “this has got to stop.” He conveniently did not mention that suppressed evidence and advances in forensic technology were never recognized in this case.

An expert in blood stain analysis, Mr. Paul E. Kish, “identified four areas of blood on the shirt Zeigler wore that night that he believes should be tested for DNA. They include blood spatter on the center front of the shirt; the left sleeve with a saturation stain; the right front shoulder with spatter; and the outside right cuff with spatter. 

The expert also recommends testing spatter staining on the left cuff of Zeigler’s pants and a saturation stain on the upper left thigh region of the pants. When Nunnelly asked whether the lack of Edwards’ blood on Zeigler’s clothing would definitively mean he didn’t kill the man, Kish said, “It means the evidence does not support that he was there when the blood was being spattered.”

Speaking for the people was Senior Assistant Attorney General Kenneth S. Nunnelly. Mrs. Dorothy Sedgewick was at the table with Nunnelly. She did not participate in the trial other than to press Nunnelly about getting the expert to say that even if the DNA is granted it won’t be exculpatory. Mr. Kish however pointed out that he thought it would be exculpatory as the sample would show one way or another if Zeigler was in close proximity to Perry Edwards when he was beaten!

The hearing focused mostly on evidence relating to Perry Edwards, Zeigler’s father-in-law. During the initial trial, Zeigler was handed a death sentence in his murder based on the fact that blood type A was found underneath Zeigler’s shirt’s left arm pit. However, that stain later proved to be from Charlie Mays’ blood. Perry Edwards and Charlie Mays both had blood type A. In 1975 however, DNA was not available.

Mr. Zeigler’s other defense attorney Dennis Tracey, on the case since 1986, made the point that allowing the testing will for once and for all prove whether Zeigler lied so many years ago.

After listening to both sides, Judge Whitehead reserved his ruling for a later date. Nunnally told the judge twice [the judge told him that he heard him the first time] that they would “raise issues” about the testing if it is granted.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Cold Case News, Forensics, Miscarriages of Justice, Zeigler Tagged With: Capital Punishment, Faulty Evidence, Miscarriage of Justice, Prosecutorial Misconduct, William Thomas Zeigler, Witnesses, Wrongful Convictions

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

On my website, I write about old, unsolved cases. Most are from the pre-DNA era and need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigation of these cases to the professionals.

My posts are about homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to these cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme and research. It remains my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more!

My database has hundreds of cases listed by the victim’s last name. You will find a brief description there as well. The database is free to the public.

All writing suggestions for cases that come in by email are added to my to-do list in the order in which they were received. Please be patient. My to-do list is very long but no case gets dropped and I will get back in touch.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the about page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you still cannot find the answer there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Categories

Top Posts & Pages

  • Remembering Teresa “Tess” Sue Hilt
  • Missing: Joanna Lopez
  • Missing: Quinn Renard Woodfolk
  • Cold Case Database
  • Case of the Month: the Sodder Children

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Recent Posts

  • Remembering Teresa “Tess” Sue Hilt
  • Junk Science by M. Chris Fabricant
  • Mary Emma Bisenthal Hammond: DNA
  • Remembering Rhonda Susan King
  • Identified: El Dorado Jane Doe

William Thomas Zeigler

Category: ALL POSTS

On March 31, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was held to request touch DNA testing. On July 18, 2016, Judge Whitehead denied that request.

On November 23, 2016, an appeal was filed with the Florida Supreme Court. On April 21, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the request for touch DNA analysis.

On May 8, 2017 a motion for a rehearing with the US Supreme Court was filed. It was denied November 13, 2017.

In the summer of 2019, the appeal for DNA testing to the Florida Conviction Integrity Unit was denied.

Richard Lapointe

Category: ALL POSTS

In March 2015, the Connecticut State Supreme Court ordered a new trial for Richard lapointe. On Oct 2, 2015, International Wrongful Conviction Day, Richard was set free. The judge ruled that he cannot be retried for the 1987 rape-murder of Mrs. Bernice Martin. Richard Lapointe died on Aug 4, 2020 of Covid19 complications.

In 1987, someone killed Bernice Martin. I hope that she will not become a forgotten file.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright: Please add a link back if you use my work. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. If you need help with this, just contact me. Thank you, Alice de Sturler

Copyright © 2022 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress