• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About the writer and her website
  • References
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Research website by Alice de Sturler

  • Cold Case Research Methods
  • How to search for cases
  • Case of the Month: Charles Lee Snowden
  • Book Reviews
  • Cold Case Database
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
You are here: Home / Zeigler / Zeigler denied request to proceed in forma pauperis

Zeigler denied request to proceed in forma pauperis

November 27, 2017 By Alice

Lady JusticeWilliam Thomas Zeigler had filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on Sept 5, 2017. In plain English, he asked the United States Supreme Court for permission to continue his trial proceedings as an indigent person meaning that fees normally associated with a lawsuit or appeal be waived. This request was denied Nov 13, 2017.

Zeigler’s goal is of course to get pre-trail evidence tested with modern technology. Zeigler also seeks legal answers to the following three questions:

  1. Does a State violate the minimum requirements of procedural due process by refusing to allow DNA testing (that was authorized by state law) when the uncontested (e.g. undisputed) evidence shows that testing is likely to prove whether the defendant is innocent?
  2. Does a State violate the minimum requirements of procedural due process when it arbitrarily denies DNA testing just because there is a possibility that the testing may be inconclusive (e.g. it will not end the doubt or the dispute because there is no firm conclusion)?
  3. May a State use novel and speculative theories of guilt that were never presented to a jury to deprive (e.g. deny) a defendant the state-created right to test evidence from his case with DNA technology to overturn a criminal conviction?

Zeigler bases his case on the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution.

The Sixth Amendment: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

The Fourteenth Amendment’s relevant part: No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

In 2017, we cannot deny the importance of DNA.

The US Justice Department‘s website says: “The past decade has seen great advances in a powerful criminal justice tool: deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA. DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. By the same token, DNA can be used to clear suspects and exonerate persons mistakenly accused or convicted of crimes. In all, DNA technology is increasingly vital to ensuring accuracy and fairness in the criminal justice system.”

Mistakes happen and what we thought we knew for sure about biological evidence has changed. The Innocence Project lists case after case of wrongfully convicted people who were completely exonerated by DNA.

The Death Penalty Information Center lists 160 cases in their database with people freed from death row after DNA proved their innocence.

Innocence is not a myth or a fable. It isn’t something we make up like a dream wishing it to be true. Innocent and incarcerated people exist and it is time that we take off our blindfolds, drop the tunnel vision, and embrace the technology that has emerged in the past decades. The fact that Zeigler is still on death row is a shame and frankly, something that should not happen in the United States of America.

______

Note: There are more than 66 posts on this blog detailing the Zeigler case. Click this link for the line-up. You can easily find Zeigler’s case as he has his own category on my blog. The category drop down menu is in the left margin.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Zeigler Tagged With: death penalty, Florida, William Thomas Zeigler

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

On my website, I write about old, unsolved cases. Most are from the pre-DNA era and need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigation of these cases to the professionals.

My posts are about homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to these cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme and research. It remains my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more!

My database has hundreds of cases listed by the victim’s last name. You will find a brief description there as well. The database is free to the public.

All writing suggestions for cases that come in by email are added to my to-do list in the order in which they were received. Please be patient. My to-do list is very long but no case gets dropped and I will get back in touch.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the about page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you still cannot find the answer there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Categories

Top Posts & Pages

  • Owachige Elice Osceola
  • Cold Case Database
  • Janet Eva Roberson Gregston
  • Missing: Joanna Lopez
  • How to search for cases

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Recent Posts

  • Bitter Blood by Jerry Bledsoe
  • Assassin’s Lullaby by Mark Rubinstein
  • Remembering Charles Lee Snowden
  • The Harvest Man by Alex Grecian
  • Guilty Verdict for Patricia Louise Smith

William Thomas Zeigler

Category: ALL POSTS

On March 31, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was held to request touch DNA testing. On July 18, 2016, Judge Whitehead denied that request.

On November 23, 2016, an appeal was filed with the Florida Supreme Court. On April 21, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the request for touch DNA analysis.

On May 8, 2017 a motion for a rehearing with the US Supreme Court was filed. It was denied November 13, 2017.

In the summer of 2019, the appeal for DNA testing to the Florida Conviction Integrity Unit was denied.

Richard Lapointe

Category: ALL POSTS

In March 2015, the Connecticut State Supreme Court ordered a new trial for Richard lapointe. On Oct 2, 2015, International Wrongful Conviction Day, Richard was set free. The judge ruled that he cannot be retried for the 1987 rape-murder of Mrs. Bernice Martin. Richard Lapointe died on Aug 4, 2020 of Covid19 complications.

In 1987, someone killed Bernice Martin. I hope that she will not become a forgotten file.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright: Please add a link back if you use my work. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. If you need help with this, just contact me. Thank you, Alice de Sturler

Copyright © 2022 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.