• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About the author and this website
  • What others say about my work
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact DCC

Defrosting Cold Cases

Research website by Alice de Sturler

  • My Research Method: Cold Cases 101
  • How to search for an unsolved case
  • Cold Case Database
  • Miscarriages of Justice
  • Book Reviews
  • Case of the Month: Susan Jessica Morey
You are here: Home / Miscarriages of Justice / Retrial for Ayako Haraguchi

Retrial for Ayako Haraguchi

July 5, 2017 By Alice

Photography AdS/Ayako Haraguchi In 1980, Ayako Haraguchi was found guilty and sentenced to ten years in prison which she served in full. She was released in 1990.

Haraguchi was accused of the 1979 killing of her then brother-in-law for insurance money.

Her then brother-in-law, Kunio Nakamura (42) was a farmer. He was found collapsed beside a ditch after falling from his bicycle in his neighborhood. However, somehow his body was later discovered in a cattle barn near his home in Osaki, Kagoshima, Japan.

Questions

None of the articles I read explain

  • what caused Nakamura to fall off his bike,
  • whether there were witnesses
  • were any cars involved
  • did he have head trauma (from hitting your head on the pavement),
  • was his neck broken and if so, at what angle,
  • did an ambulance provide medical care at the spot,
  • any blood found on that street, and of course,
  • how his body was moved.

If you know the answer to any of these questions or have newspaper links, please contact me so we can update this post.

Haraguchi and three men — the victim’s two brothers and a nephew — were accused of this murder. The victim’s eldest brother was Ayako Haraguchi’s then-husband. The three men did not contest the 1981 guilty verdict. Haraguchi did. Her conviction was based on the confessions of those three men. However, now there is doubt about their mentally competency and that those confessions were false.

The judicial route taken

In 2002, Haraguchi won the appeal to reopen the case because of “doubts about the credibility of confessions as interrogators are suspected of having forced or guided the statements.” In 2004, that decision was turned down by the Fukuoka High Court. Haraguchi launched a second plea for a retrial in 2010. It was dismissed. Her third attempt was successful.

This success is based on the following:

  • Her defense lawyers argued that the cause of death was shock due to loss of blood caused by the bicycle accident (but I have not found any details about this accident or whether it involved cars, etc. See my notes above.)
  • a forensic report casts doubt over the court’s finding that the victim was strangled with a towel. The autopsy pictures apparently show no signs of suffocation on the victim’s body. I have not found the autopsy report online.
  • The prosecution blame decomposition for the absence of suffocation signs. Is that true? Manual strangulation (even with a towel) will leave damage to the neck. The autopsy report can tell us the truth about the condition of the neck and windpipe.
  • The three men were mentally incompetent however, I have not read anything about their state of minds, IQ, etc.

From the three men, the nephew also filed an appeal for a retrial. Alas, he committed suicide in 2001. The court also accepted a plea for a retrial from Haraguchi’s then-husband. He passed away. I did not read anything about the third man.

Remaining questions

Presiding Judge Atsushi Tomita said in the latest decision that the confessions “are not credible as there is a doubt that they may have changed in line with the investigative authority’s guidance.” The court said that there was no objective evidence to support the confessions given by these three men. The question remains why? Was police corrupt? Did they have a pattern of coercing confessions? Were the officers involved ever indicted? What happened to the insurance claim?

The Kagoshima District Public Prosecutor’s Office is considering to appeal this latest court decision. They should weigh this very carefully because I agree with the Japanese Times: “the prosecutors should follow the principle of criminal justice that the benefit of doubt goes to the accused. If they still have a case against Haraguchi, they should make it in a retrial.”

Please share this post, thank you.

  • Tweet
  • Print
  • Email
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket

Related

Filed Under: Miscarriages of Justice Tagged With: Ayako Haraguchi, False Confessions, Japan, Strangulation, Wrongful Convictions

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

I am a true crime writer raising awareness for old unsolved cases from the pre-DNA era that are in need of renewed media attention. I do not actively investigate these cases. I leave that to the professionals.

My posts are about homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to old cases.

I review books but only select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction and/or mysteries.

My database has more than 289 cases listed by the victim’s last name. You will find a brief description there as well.

All case suggestions that come in by email for writing considerations are added to my to-do list in the order in which they were received. Please be patient as my to-do list is very long.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the about page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you still cannot find the answer there, please contact me.

Thank you, Alice de Sturler

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Categories

Top Posts & Pages

  • Cold Case Database
  • Remembering the Frog Boys
  • How to search for cases
  • Amber Elaine Lundgren (Feb 7, 1977 - June 7, 1997)
  • The 1980 Tim Hack and Kelly Drew murders

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

RSS Defrosting Cold Cases

  • One Oblique One by Keith Wright
  • Susan Jessica Morey (Aug 13, 1962 – June 18, 1990)  
  • Defrosting Cold Cases 2009-2019
  • The Butchering Art by Lindsey Fitzharris
  • Sonia Carmen Herok Stone

William Thomas Zeigler

Category: ALL POSTS

On March 31, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was held to request touch DNA testing. On July 18, 2016, Judge Whitehead denied that request.

On November 23, 2016, an appeal was filed with the Florida Supreme Court. On April 21, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the request for touch DNA analysis.

On May 8, 2017 a motion for a rehearing with the US Supreme Court was filed. It was denied November 13, 2017.

In the summer of 2019, the appeal for DNA testing to the Florida Conviction Integrity Unit was denied.

Richard Lapointe

Category: ALL POSTS

In March 2015, the Connecticut State Supreme Court ordered a new trial. On Oct 2, 2015, International Wrongful Conviction Day, Richard Lapointe was set free. The judge ruled that he cannot be retried.

We close this wrongful conviction aspect of the file but now we must work on it as a unsolved murder case. In 1987, someone killed Bernice Martin. I hope that she will not become a forgotten file.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright: Please add a link back if you use my work. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. If you need help with this, just contact me. Thank you, Alice de Sturler

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2009–2019 - Defrosting Cold Cases - All rights reserved · Hosting & WordPress: 3J WordPress Write Data

wordpress counter

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.