• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About the author and her website
  • References
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Research website by Alice de Sturler

  • My Research Method
  • How to search for cases
  • Cold Case Database
  • Case of the Month: What we lost
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Historical Mysteries / Part 3: King Richard III: Ruthless Ruler? Yes. Regicide? No.

Part 3: King Richard III: Ruthless Ruler? Yes. Regicide? No.

February 5, 2013 By Alice

facial reconstruction King Richard IIIPart 3: King Richard III: Ruthless Ruler? Yes. Regicide? No.

It is time to conclude this mini-series on the cold case of the Princes in the Tower and whether their uncle, King Richard III, is justly accused of being their murderer. While I was pondering whether to discuss some more books that I read or, whether to actually not write this final part, a thought occurred to me. It isn’t the light bulb that you are hoping for so the historical mystery stands as is however, I wish to make one thing clear(er).

This is not an accusation and no, I cannot prove it at all. No, I have no insider information and no, you also cannot prove it could not have happened.

Here goes:

It is all about blood. Not blood shedding but producing blood e.g. giving birth to the successor and with that strengthening the family line and securing the throne for generations to come.

In this area, both Richard III and Henry VII faced some challenges.

Henry VII did not have any offspring at the time the rumours went around that the Princes were gone. His best bet to secure the throne (his own claim was weaker than Richard’s) was to marry the oldest daughter of the last King who the people held for their legitimate ruler. In other words, Elizabeth of York who was the oldest daughter of King Edward IV. To make this happen, Henry VII repealed the Titulus Regius making Elizabeth a legitimate child again and of course, then he married her. But all that was in the future and did not mean that he had secured his throne when he needed it most. Repealing the act is one thing but he still needed to marry Elizabeth, she still needed to produce an heir and, that heir would still have to be strong enough to live. Remember that surviving infancy in medieval times was a real challenge, just look it up.

Richard III had his own worries. His wife Anne Neville had only been able to produce one son and sadly, he passed away. Then Anne passed away. Richard had illegitimate children but they could never succeed him on the throne.

Unlike Henry, Richard did have immediate options. Leave out Lincoln and Warwick for a moment. The Princes, both of the Plantagenet line, could succeed him at any time. Now, instead of a threat they would safeguard the throne for the next generations of Plantagenets. The princes would eventually marry and their offspring would secure the throne for the Plantagenet family for decades to come.

Of course, I can hear you say that Richard did not regard them as a safety net but as direct threats to his claim on the throne. Maybe he did, initially. However, maybe he never did. Every head of state worries about succession. You cannot convince me that succession was never an issue that Richard worried about.

Richard married Anne in 1472 and their only son Edward, was born a year later. But until King Edward IV died, no other offspring was born to Anne & Richard III. So Richard must have sensed that IF he were ever to take the throne, his succession would not be as safe as could be if he had more sons. Moreover, if anything would happen to his only son, his family might not be able to hold on to the throne. Richard’s son died in 1484, one year after King Edward IV passed away and left Richard the Protector of his sons and the realm. Despite being declared illegitimate, Richard may have considered them his only option to actually secure the throne for his family. And that would have been an enormous incentive to keep them away from harm and thus alive.

For Henry, the princes alive would mean a return of the crown to the Plantagenet family and thus that his own line would not endure. That could be a motive to make the princes disappear. I am not accusing him but merely explaining why to the one the princes posed a much bigger threat than to the other.

If this historical mystery interests you as well, there are some great works out there to read. The Richard III Society is planning a complete overhaul of their site to add more information. It is a wonderful resource for further reading and to get a take on the other suspects who have not been mentioned in my mini-series. Read about it and make up your own mind. Leave me your thoughts in the comment box below.

Go!

P.S.: If there ever is more news such as DNA testing regarding the princes, I will update these posts.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Historical Mysteries Tagged With: Edward IV, Edward V, Elizabeth Woodville, Henry Tudor, King Richard III, Princes in the Tower, regicide, Richard of York, the War of the Roses, UK

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Recharge by writing | Boomerang Zone says:
    September 21, 2015 at 10:43 am

    […] III is too easy as none of the people who wrote about their disappearance at that time considered succession. There isn’t one head of state who is not concerned with succession and from that point of […]

  2. Sum it Up! #44 says:
    October 12, 2013 at 8:22 pm

    […] permanently, yes. But that did not count for Richard III. There was still the issue of not having a blood heir. Tudor didn’t have one but he was not king yet. Richard III as king had already lost his wife […]

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

On this website, I write about old, unsolved cases. Most are from the pre-DNA era and are in need of renewed media attention. I only do research and leave the active investigation of these cases to the professionals.

My posts are about homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to these cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme and research. It remains my prerogative to not review a book.

My database has over 300 cases listed by the victim’s last name. You will find a brief description there as well. The database will always be free to the public to use. You cannot buy ad space on my website, ever.

All writing suggestions that come in by email are added to my to-do list in the order in which they were received. Please be patient. My to-do list is very long but no case gets dropped and I will get back in touch.

Defrosting Cold Cases is NOT an organization. It is my brainchild.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the about page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you still cannot find the answer there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Categories

Top Posts & Pages

  • Cold Case Database
  • Amber Elaine Lundgren (Feb 7, 1977 - June 7, 1997)
  • Gina Renee Hall partial remains found
  • How to search for cases
  • The 1980 Tim Hack and Kelly Drew murders

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

RSS Defrosting Cold Cases

  • Otha Liggins III (1971 – 1999)
  • What we lost
  • The Ethics of Forensic Genealogy part 2
  • Once Two Sister by Sarah Warburton
  • Toronto John Doe 1989

William Thomas Zeigler

Category: ALL POSTS

On March 31, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was held to request touch DNA testing. On July 18, 2016, Judge Whitehead denied that request.

On November 23, 2016, an appeal was filed with the Florida Supreme Court. On April 21, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the request for touch DNA analysis.

On May 8, 2017 a motion for a rehearing with the US Supreme Court was filed. It was denied November 13, 2017.

In the summer of 2019, the appeal for DNA testing to the Florida Conviction Integrity Unit was denied.

Richard Lapointe

Category: ALL POSTS

In March 2015, the Connecticut State Supreme Court ordered a new trial for Richard lapointe. On Oct 2, 2015, International Wrongful Conviction Day, Richard was set free. The judge ruled that he cannot be retried for the 1987 rape-murder of Mrs. Bernice Martin. Richard Lapointe died on Aug 4, 2020 of Covid19 complications.

In 1987, someone killed Bernice Martin. I hope that she will not become a forgotten file.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright: Please add a link back if you use my work. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. If you need help with this, just contact me. Thank you, Alice de Sturler

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2009–2021 - Defrosting Cold Cases - All rights reserved · Hosting & WordPress: 3J WordPress Write Data

wordpress counter

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.