• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About DCC and the writer
  • Guest Writers
  • Testimonials
  • Archives 2009 – present
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact

Defrosting Cold Cases

Est. 2009

  • Cold Case Database: Index and Summaries
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
  • Two Research Methods
  • How to search for a case
  • Case of the Month (2014 – 2024)
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Miscarriages of Justice / Nie Shubin exonerated 21 years after his execution

Nie Shubin exonerated 21 years after his execution

December 5, 2016 By Alice

Nie Shubin/CNN
Nie Shubin/CNN

From KFDR: “China’s top court overturned Nie Shubin’s conviction Friday, in a landmark case that exposed deep flaws in China’s criminal justice system.”

Nie Shubin was executed by firing squad in 1995 without notifying his parents. He was just 20 years old and had been detained for seven months.

Nie Shubin was found guilty of the 1994 rape/murder of a woman in Shijiazhuang, in Hebei province.  The 1995 conviction and the sentencing were called “unreliable and incomplete” by the Supreme People’s Court. Last June, the highest court ordered the case to be retried “openly and fairly.” In 2005, Wang Shujin confessed to the rape/murder. He was arrested for another crime. Wang Shujin also confessed to the rape and murder of three other women in Hebei Province from 1994 through 1995.

“The investigation by the Shandong court, which was extended four times due to complexities in the case, concluded that there were major inconsistencies during various aspects of the trial and conviction process. Among these inconsistencies included fabrication of Nie Shubin’s signature on six different legal documents.”

Significant gaps in this case include a confession given possibly under torture and the lack of direct evidence linking Nie Shubin to the crime or the victim. From the papers, “the police medical examiner did not even try to recover traces of sperm from the victim’s body, the only evidence used to convict Nie on the charge of rape was his confession—a clear violation of the Criminal Procedure Law.”

I do not understand why police zoomed in on Nie as a suspect. Did he know the woman? Was he seen in the area? Was Nie the only suspect? And if we do not have semen to test for DNA can we completely trust Shujin’s confession? Or was DNA recovered later and then compared to Shujin?

If you wish to read more about the Nie Shubin case, click here. It takes you to the Human Rights Journal from the Dui Hua Foundation. The Dui Hua is a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing the protection of universally recognized human rights in China and in the United States.

Rest in peace, Nie Shubin.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor

Related

Filed Under: Miscarriages of Justice Tagged With: China, death penalty, exonerated, Nie Shubin, wrongful conviction

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

Since 2009, I write about unsolved cases that need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigations to the authorities.

My posts cover homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to unsolved cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme, tone, and research. It is my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more.

My databases are free to the public. Cases are sorted by the victim’s last name.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the About page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you cannot find the answers there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Top Posts & Pages

  • Gregory McRoberts: hit-and-run victim
  • Gregory McRoberts DNA Update
  • Eric Haider Update
  • Gone for 50 years: the Beaumont Children
  • Remembering Dana Bailey

Categories

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Protected by Copyscape

Copyright © 2026 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress