• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About the writer and her website
  • References
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Research website by Alice de Sturler

  • Cold Case Research Methods
  • How to search for cases
  • Case of the Month: Charles Lee Snowden
  • Book Reviews
  • Cold Case Database
    • Index
      • Cases Index A-G
      • Cases Index H-N
      • Cases Index O-Z
    • Summaries
      • Case Summaries A-G
      • Case Summaries H-N
      • Case Summaries O-Z
You are here: Home / Cold Case News / Nicky Verstappen verdict

Nicky Verstappen verdict

November 20, 2020 By Alice

Nicky Verstappen Photography Dutch Police
Nicky Verstappen Photography Dutch Police

Today came the long awaited verdict in the case of Nicky Verstappen. The fact that we waited about five weeks for the verdict, points to how unusual the case is and how heavy it weighs on the judges. This was symbolized today.

After the judges were seated, they first addressed Nicky’s family. Acknowledging the pain of the past decades, the agony of not knowing, and sharing the frustration of still not having all answers, set the tone for the verdict.

The way the verdict was read is also unique for the Netherlands. All three judges read a part, the senior judge went first.

They will cover four charges: homicide, sexual abuse, abduction, and possession of child pornography.

Spain

No new documentation was received from the court in Spain regarding child pornography. The very specific and graphic keyword searches do speak volumes. Possession of child pornography was not listed on the Spanish’s court order to grant extradition so, this matter is not resolved as of yet.

Sexual Abuse

The senior judge handled this part and she detailed why the court reached this conclusion. At the time that Nicky was found, the exact cause of death could not be established. The pathologists did see rectal trauma caused by penetration. Other pathologists and experts only examined photography but never saw the body.

The consensus is that the trauma was caused by penile penetration or by a smooth, large object. One expert indicated that the trauma was caused pre-mortem, shortly before Nicky died. The senior judge indicated that she doesn’t doubt the experts’ findings.

The three judges agreed that Nicky was stripped and dressed again later. Remember, his pajama bottom and underwear were on his body backwards and inside-out. They also agreed that his body position was staged after death. The court agrees that the DNA traces and spot placements match the movements to remove underwear. They also found no innocent explanation for Brech’s DNA in Verstappen’s underwear. The court considers sexual abuse proven.

Abduction

There is no indication that Verstappen was a willing sexual partner so even if he wandered after using the camp’s restrooms, the court considers the abduction proven.

Homicide

From the beginning, the case has been hindered by not knowing the exact time and cause of death. There are five causes of death: natural, an accident, suicide, homicide, or undetermined. The experts ruled out death by natural causes as well as by suicide and death by an accident. That leaves us with homicide and an undetermined cause of death.

Because the sexual abuse is established, the medical experts believe that it contributed to Verstappen’s death. The cause of death is therefore homicide. Homicide can be unintentional and intentional. In Nicky’s case, suffocation is the most likely cause. The court rejects sunburns, snake bites, dehydration, etc. They mark that Verstappen did not have any underlying medical issues or genetic disorders.

No expert has been able to establish how long Nicky was deprived of oxygen or, if he was smothered several times before he finally died. To answer part of this question, the court refers to Brech’s record.

Three young children were abused by Brech. The way that Brech brought them under his control was to approach the boys from behind, place his hand over their mouths, and then force the boys to come along. Being forcefully pushed to the ground, hand over mouth, and the shock of sexual abuse, all taken together could have caused Verstappen’s death. However, Brech may not have intentionally deprived Verstappen of oxygen.

The intent to kill (or murder in the first degree) has not been proven. Also not proven by the prosecution was that Brech understood that Verstappen’s death would automatically follow from his actions. The fact that he sexually abused Nicky does not prove that he meant for Nicky to die. The court found Brech not guilty of manslaughter. Neither murder nor manslaughter was legally proven in court however, they literally said that Brech is not beyond reproach. If it had not been for Brech, Nicky Verstappen would be alive today. Nobody and nothing else caused Verstappen’s death.

The court dismisses Brech’s videotaped statement as untrue. They do not believe that he found a dead boy and that Brech straightened the body and the clothes in a moment of grief. As for DNA cross-contamination, the court pointed out that the placement and amounts of Brech’s DNA in Verstappen’s underwear cannot be explained by cross-contamination. Rejected too were the theories of multiple attackers.

Culpability

As Brech did not cooperate in any of the psychological assessments, the findings are not exhausting. However, Brech was deemed capable of making choices and has shown that in years prior to this case, that restrained was possible. The court found Brech to be fit to be held fully accountable.

The court noted that the only person who can answer all the Verstappen Family’s questions, is Brech. They acknowledged how scared Nicky must have been in the last moments of his life. Brech said that in time more (information) would be revealed but he never did. Despite stating this, that the court is holding this against Brech, the verdict does not reflect anything but the law.

Verdict

The court sentenced Brech to 12 1/2 years for sexual abuse causing Verstappen’s death, his abduction, and possession of child pornography with deductions for time served since his arrest.

The sentence is lower than requested (15 years) by the prosecution. However, the court felt hindered by not having concrete evidence of cause/exact time of death.

The defense will appeal, the prosecution will announce its decision later next week. Kindly note that this is a translation of various newspaper articles and the livefeed about the case. I may tweak the translation later on when I re-read this. All posts about the Nicky Verstappen case can be found here.

Note: some of you have expressed frustration that Brech was not sentenced for intentional homicide or manslaughter. I get that frustration. Many in the Netherlands feel the same but the law is the law.

There was no precedent for the court to act on. In previous abusive encounters, none of the boys were murdered. He let them all go or, they got away without Brech hunting them. He has never been charged or convicted for murder. It isn’t perfect. That is why the three-panel court went out of its way to show through departures of procedural ceremony, that they understand. But they are bound by law

Rest in peace, Nicky Verstappen.

UPDATE: the prosecution will appeal.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Cold Case News Tagged With: DNA, Nicky Verstappen, suffocation, the Netherlands

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

On my website, I write about old, unsolved cases. Most are from the pre-DNA era and need renewed media attention. I only do research and leave active investigation of these cases to the professionals.

My posts are about homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to these cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme and research. It remains my prerogative to not review a book. Please check the FAQ page for more!

My database has hundreds of cases listed by the victim’s last name. You will find a brief description there as well. The database is free to the public.

All writing suggestions for cases that come in by email are added to my to-do list in the order in which they were received. Please be patient. My to-do list is very long but no case gets dropped and I will get back in touch.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the about page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you still cannot find the answer there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Categories

Top Posts & Pages

  • Owachige Elice Osceola
  • Cold Case Database
  • Janet Eva Roberson Gregston
  • Missing: Joanna Lopez
  • How to search for cases

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

Recent Posts

  • Bitter Blood by Jerry Bledsoe
  • Assassin’s Lullaby by Mark Rubinstein
  • Remembering Charles Lee Snowden
  • The Harvest Man by Alex Grecian
  • Guilty Verdict for Patricia Louise Smith

William Thomas Zeigler

Category: ALL POSTS

On March 31, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was held to request touch DNA testing. On July 18, 2016, Judge Whitehead denied that request.

On November 23, 2016, an appeal was filed with the Florida Supreme Court. On April 21, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the request for touch DNA analysis.

On May 8, 2017 a motion for a rehearing with the US Supreme Court was filed. It was denied November 13, 2017.

In the summer of 2019, the appeal for DNA testing to the Florida Conviction Integrity Unit was denied.

Richard Lapointe

Category: ALL POSTS

In March 2015, the Connecticut State Supreme Court ordered a new trial for Richard lapointe. On Oct 2, 2015, International Wrongful Conviction Day, Richard was set free. The judge ruled that he cannot be retried for the 1987 rape-murder of Mrs. Bernice Martin. Richard Lapointe died on Aug 4, 2020 of Covid19 complications.

In 1987, someone killed Bernice Martin. I hope that she will not become a forgotten file.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright: Please add a link back if you use my work. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. If you need help with this, just contact me. Thank you, Alice de Sturler

Copyright © 2022 ·News Pro · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.