• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About the author and her website
  • References
  • Archives
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Page

Defrosting Cold Cases

Research website by Alice de Sturler

  • My Research Method
  • How to search for cases
  • Cold Case Database
  • Case of the Month: The Unclaimed
  • Book Reviews
You are here: Home / Cold Case News / Is the use of genetic testing constitutional?

Is the use of genetic testing constitutional?

June 17, 2020 By Alice

Michelle Martinko, courtesy Robert J. Riley
Michelle Martinko, courtesy Robert J. Riley

Genetic testing is what finally brought the case of Michelle Marie Martinko in court. Jerry Lynn Burns (66) was found guilty of Michelle’s 1979 murder based on genetic testing of DNA. He is awaiting his sentencing hearing. It will be the mandatory life sentence.

In the meantime, his attorney, Leon Spies, is working on the appeals. You can read the motion here.

Spies argues in a motion that he wants a new trial for his client. He is preserving all his objections raised during trial in this motion. Of course, the prosecution will resist the defense’s motion. No firm deadlines have been set yet.

I want to highlight the following:

  1. proportionality: Spies argues that the weight of the evidence used to find Burns guilty of first degree murder is questionable. “The evidence and inferences arising from the evidence, even viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, were insufficient to warrant a rational trier of fact finding the Defendant guilty of murder in the first degree.” In other words, finding Burns’ DNA alone is not enough for a first degree verdict implying that the DNA should have bolstered the other evidence in the case and Spies here indicates, there wasn’t enough evidence.
  2. violation of the privilege against self-incrimination: Spies says that statements Burns made at the time of his arrest should not have been used in court.
  3. violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment: “the court erred in rejecting the Defendant’s claim that the searches and seizures leading to the discovery of his DNA profile and that of his family violated his rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, as guaranteed by Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the State of Iowa.”

The use of genetic testing is not without controversy. You can read here how they got Burns’ DNA. The gathering of discarded materials for DNA testing by the authorities has been debated before. On the one hand, of course we want to solve crimes. However, is this a form of privacy violation? In case of picking up discarded materials, the legal answer is no. The abandonment doctrine means there is no expectation of privacy in abandoned materials.

But can the authorities use just any ancestry database that they want? How well is your privacy protected against such searches? Do you automatically give up a certain part of privacy when you enter your DNA in an ancestry database? And, can it backfire?

What Spies might be attempting to do is to force the courts to take a position on genetic testing, in other words can it withstand the Daubert standard, i.e. prove that the method is in general accepted by the scientific community. I wrote about that here.

When you enter your DNA in a database you expose your whole bloodline to a potential police investigation. I have seen people disagree with this. “You do not expose a whole family but only the ones with a DNA match.” But this is wrong.

Unless a criminal’s DNA is already in those commercial databases any result will always be a partial match. And that exposes many people related to the criminal to police investigations based on just a partial match.

Absent federal regulations, it may be up to the courts to strike a fair balance.

I will post more about the appeals procedure as it progresses.

Thank you for sharing!

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Cold Case News, Forensics Tagged With: Cedar Rapids, DNA, Forensic Genealogy, Iowa, Michelle Marie Martinko

Primary Sidebar

Dina Fort

Author Notes

On this website, I write about old, unsolved cases. Most are from the pre-DNA era and are in need of renewed media attention. I only do research and leave the active investigation of these cases to the professionals.

My posts are about homicides, missing and unidentified people, wrongful convictions, and forensics as related to these cases.

On book reviews: I only review select works of true crime, crime fiction, and historical fiction/mysteries. The stories have to fit my website's theme and research. It remains my prerogative to not review a book.

My database has over 325 cases listed by the victim’s last name. You will find a brief description there as well. The database will always be free to the public to use. You cannot buy ad space on my website, ever.

All writing suggestions that come in by email are added to my to-do list in the order in which they were received. Please be patient. My to-do list is very long but no case gets dropped and I will get back in touch.

Defrosting Cold Cases is NOT an organization. It is my brainchild.

If you have any questions about my website please check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the about page, and the tabs in both menu bars. If you still cannot find the answer there, please contact me.

Thank you,

Alice de Sturler

Copyright

If you use my work, please add a link back. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. Thank you!

Protected by Copyscape

Categories

Top Posts & Pages

  • Cold Case Database
  • How to search for cases
  • Gina Renee Hall partial remains found
  • Missing: Norvel Robert Nelson III
  • The 1980 Tim Hack and Kelly Drew murders

Subscribe to DCC by email

Enter your email address to get new posts notifications in your inbox

RSS Defrosting Cold Cases

  • Missing: Norvel Robert Nelson III
  • Gun Violence
  • Emily Johanne Carmela Starkloff
  • Donald Ray Watson (1953 – 1978)
  • DeAngelo moves to Corcoran State Prison

William Thomas Zeigler

Category: ALL POSTS

On March 31, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was held to request touch DNA testing. On July 18, 2016, Judge Whitehead denied that request.

On November 23, 2016, an appeal was filed with the Florida Supreme Court. On April 21, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the request for touch DNA analysis.

On May 8, 2017 a motion for a rehearing with the US Supreme Court was filed. It was denied November 13, 2017.

In the summer of 2019, the appeal for DNA testing to the Florida Conviction Integrity Unit was denied.

Richard Lapointe

Category: ALL POSTS

In March 2015, the Connecticut State Supreme Court ordered a new trial for Richard lapointe. On Oct 2, 2015, International Wrongful Conviction Day, Richard was set free. The judge ruled that he cannot be retried for the 1987 rape-murder of Mrs. Bernice Martin. Richard Lapointe died on Aug 4, 2020 of Covid19 complications.

In 1987, someone killed Bernice Martin. I hope that she will not become a forgotten file.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright: Please add a link back if you use my work. Let your readers know where you found your information. I do the same for you. If you need help with this, just contact me. Thank you, Alice de Sturler

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2009–2021 - Defrosting Cold Cases - All rights reserved · Hosting & WordPress: 3J WordPress Write Data

wordpress counter

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.